Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has emerged as a crucial concept in modern business practice, reflecting the idea that corporations have responsibilities beyond profit maximization, extending to social, environmental, and ethical dimensions. Over time, various theories have been developed to explain why businesses should engage in CSR and how they can integrate it effectively into their strategies. These theories provide frameworks for understanding the rationale, scope, and methods of corporate engagement in social responsibility. Among these, the primary theories include the Classical Theory, the Stakeholder Theory, the Social Contract Theory, the Legitimacy Theory, and the Triple Bottom Line approach. Each of these offers unique insights into the motivations and expectations surrounding corporate social behavior. The Classical Theory of CSR is rooted in the traditional economic view, most famously articulated by economist Milton Friedman. According to this perspective, the primary responsibility of a business is to its shareholders, and its main objective should be profit maximization within the boundaries of law and ethical custom. CSR, in this sense, is often viewed as secondary or even potentially detrimental if it diverts resources from shareholder returns. While this theory emphasizes financial performance and efficiency, it has been criticized for neglecting broader societal responsibilities and the potential benefits of ethical engagement in social and environmental initiatives. Contrasting with the Classical Theory, the Stakeholder Theory offers a broader and more inclusive understanding of CSR. Developed and popularized by R. Edward Freeman, this theory argues that corporations have responsibilities not only