Generalisation in historiography and research method refers to the process by which historians and researchers move from specific facts, events, or observations to broader patterns, interpretations, or conclusions. It is an essential intellectual tool that allows scholars to make sense of vast and often fragmented historical data by identifying regularities, relationships, and recurring trends across time and space. Without generalisation, history would remain a mere collection of isolated facts, lacking coherence, interpretation, and explanatory power. In the context of historical research, generalisation involves synthesizing evidence drawn from primary and secondary sources to formulate statements that go beyond individual cases. For example, a historian studying multiple peasant uprisings in different regions may generalise about the socio-economic conditions that tend to produce agrarian unrest. Such generalisations do not deny the uniqueness of individual events but seek to identify common underlying factors that connect them. Thus, generalisation bridges the gap between empirical data and interpretative understanding. Generalisation is closely related to the concept of abstraction. While historical facts are concrete and specific, generalisation requires the historian to abstract from these details and focus on broader categories such as class, economy, culture, or political structures. This process involves selecting relevant evidence, discarding irrelevant details, and organizing information into meaningful patterns. It is through this abstraction that historians can construct narratives and explanations that are intelligible and analytically useful. In historiography, generalisation plays a crucial role in shaping historical interpretations. Different schools of historical thought often rely on distinct types of generalisations. For instance, economic historians may generalise about the role of material conditions in shaping historical change, while cultural historians may emphasize patterns of belief, ideology, and symbolism. Marxist historiography, in particular, is known for its emphasis on generalisations related to class struggle, modes of production, and economic determinism. On the other hand,