Communication, as a discipline, has long been concerned with understanding how information is transmitted, received, and interpreted. Over the years, scholars have developed several models to conceptualize communication, each offering unique insights into its processes, components, and effects. Among the most influential are the Shannon-Weaver Model and the Lasswell Model. While these models were developed in different contexts and for distinct purposes, they both provide a framework for understanding communication in general and, more specifically, development communication, where the goal is social change, awareness, and empowerment. The Shannon-Weaver Model, introduced by Claude Shannon and Warren Weaver in 1949, is often referred to as the “mathematical model of communication.” Originally created to improve technical communication in telephony, the model later became widely applied in broader communication studies. It conceptualizes communication as a linear process consisting of several key elements: a sender (information source), a message, an encoder (transmitter), a channel, a decoder (receiver), and finally, the destination. Crucially, the model also introduces the concept of noise, which refers to any interference that distorts or interrupts the message during transmission. By emphasizing the structural components of communication, the Shannon-Weaver Model allows for the identification of potential barriers and points of failure in the communication process. This linear perspective is particularly useful in development communication, where information often needs to reach a large and diverse audience effectively. For instance, public health campaigns, such as those aimed at promoting vaccination or preventing the spread of infectious diseases, rely heavily on clear, unambiguous transmission of messages. Using the Shannon-Weaver Model, communicators can analyze how messages travel from central authorities to community members, identify sources of noise such as illiteracy, language barriers, or misinformation, and design strategies to minimize distortion. This model underscores the importance of clarity, precision, and selection of appropriate channels—whether mass media, community radio, or social media platforms—to ensure that development messages are successfully received. However, the Shannon-Weaver Model has limitations. Its linearity implies a one-way flow of communication, which overlooks the feedback mechanisms that are essential in participatory development communication. Development initiatives often require active engagement, dialogue, and iterative feedback from target