Discuss the PRA as a basic tool for participatory management and how are these tools used in the development of participatory projects ?
05 Feb 2018
Answer :
Word Count : 2142
PRA is intended to enable local communities to conduct their own analysis and to plan and take action. PRA involves project staff learning together with villagers about the village. The aim of PRA is to help strengthen the capacity of villagers to plan, make decisions, and to take action towards improving their own situation. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) is considered one of the popular and effective approaches to gather information in rural areas. This approach was developed in early 1990s with considerable shift in paradigm from top-down to bottom-up approach, and from blueprint to the learning process. In fact, it is a shift from extractive survey questionnaires to experience sharing by local people. PRA is based on village experiences where communities effectively manage their natural resources. PRA is a methodology of learning rural life and their environment from the rural people. It requires researchers / field workers to act as facilitators to help local people conduct their own analysis, plan and take action accordingly. It is based on the principle that local people are creative and capable and can do their own investigations, analysis, and planning. The basic concept of PRA is to learn from rural people. Chambers (1992) has defined PRA as an approach and methods for learning about rural life and conditions from, with and by rural people. He further stated that PRA extends into analysis, planning and action. PRA closely involve villagers and local officials in the process.
Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) recently renamed Participatory Learning for Action (PLA), is a methodological approach that is used to enable farmers to analyse their own situation and to develop a common perspective on natural resource management and agriculture at village level. PRA is an assessment and learning process that empowers farmers to create the information base they need for participatory planning and action. Outsiders contribute facilitation skills and external information and opinions. Many different tools have been developed for use in PRA.
PRA is used
To ascertain needs
To establish priorities for development activities
Within the scope of feasibility studies
During the implementation phase of projects
Within the scope of monitoring and evaluation of projects
For studies of specific topics
For focusing formal surveys on essential aspects, and identifying conflicting group interests.
Tools of PRA
Diagram
Priority matrix
Seasonal calendar
Time trends
Venn diagram
Map
Provides alternative database
Depicts differing local perception of local problems/needs
Transect
Builds rapport with locals
Supports maps of local resources/needs
Entire community involved in prioritizing needs and development initiatives
Helps to identify lean periods for resources and timing of supply of key farm inputs
Provides local perspective on time changes in natural resources/ecology/etc.
Helps to identify marginalized individuals and groups within the village
Participatory rural appraisal (PRA) is a set of participatory and largely visual techniques for assessing group and community resources, identifying and prioritizing problems and appraising strategies for solving them. It is a research/planning methodology in which a local community (with or without the assistance of outsiders) studies an issue that concerns the population, prioritizes problems, evaluates options for solving the problem(s) and comes up with a Community Action Plan to address the concerns that have been raised.
PRA is particularly concerned that the multiple perspectives that exist in any community are represented in the analysis and that the community itself takes the lead in evaluating its situation and finding solutions. Outsiders may participate as facilitators or in providing technical information but they should not 'take charge' of the process.
PRA is used
To ascertain needs
To establish priorities for development activities
Within the scope of feasibility studies
During the implementation phase of projects
Within the scope of monitoring and evaluation of projects
For studies of specific topics
For focusing formal surveys on essential aspects, and identifying conflicting group interests.
The selection and use of training tools must match the training needs and type of training. The major challenges are:
a) sensitization to bring about attitudinal and behavioural change; and
b) using participatory techniques to build rapport, elicit support, information and participation of the people in their own development.