Globalization, as a multifaceted and intricate phenomenon, has spurred significant debates within the realm of International Relations (IR). Traditional theories of IR, originating from the realist, liberal, and constructivist paradigms, offer valuable insights into the understanding of global interactions. However, they exhibit limitations when solely applied to the comprehensive explanation of globalization. To address this question effectively, it is essential to delve into the traditional theories and examine their perspectives on globalization.

Realism, a foundational theory in IR, primarily focuses on power dynamics among states, emphasizing the role of nation-states as the primary actors in the international system. Realists such as Morgenthau and Waltz emphasized the anarchical nature of the international system, where states seek power to ensure their security and survival. However, realism's emphasis on state-centric power struggles may fall short in explaining the complexities of globalization, as it often overlooks non-state actors and the interconnectedness beyond state boundaries.

Liberalism, on the other hand, stresses cooperation, interdependence, and institutions as crucial components