Agnosticism, as a philosophical position, occupies a middle ground between theism and atheism, asserting that the existence or non-existence of God or the divine is unknown or perhaps unknowable. While agnosticism offers a cautious and intellectually honest stance, it is not without its challenges, both conceptual and practical. One of the primary challenges lies in defining the limits of knowledge. Agnosticism requires a clear demarcation between what can be known and what lies beyond human comprehension. However, drawing this boundary is inherently difficult, as knowledge itself is a dynamic and evolving concept. What may seem unknowable today could be accessible tomorrow through new philosophical, scientific, or experiential insights. This raises the problem of temporal uncertainty: agnosticism’s claim is provisional and may be challenged as human understanding evolves. Another significant challenge is the issue of moral and existential guidance. Many religious systems provide comprehensive ethical frameworks, rituals, and purposes rooted in divine authority. Agnosticism, by refraining from commitment to belief or disbelief in God, often lacks a structured source of moral authority. This can lead to a perceived moral ambiguity or a need to construct ethical frameworks